BioSci DD

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Q%20&%20Sup%20&%20Crabs.png" alt=""; width="50%"> Q is an Environmental Management student who has just started a placement with a coastal biodiversity monitoring unit. The team has just discovered an invasive species of crab in the local waterways that have been growing in number and making their way to a coastal area. This invasive species outcompetes native species and damages fishing gear (so the fishing community are not happy). Q’s supervisor says to Q: “This is an interesting problem, and a good chance for you to show how you’d tackle a challenge like this. If it were up to you, what would you do first?” --- ####What should Q suggest? Review what is known about this invasive species, where they’ve been found, how fast they spread, and their ecological impacts. [[Talk to local fishers and environmental officers ->Dc 1pt]] to understand what they’re experiencing. We know these crabs are invasive and growing in numbers. [[We should start removal measures immediately. ->As]] We could start a trapping programme or restricted fishing areas.

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorHappyYYY.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor agrees that this is a good first step. Exploring the problem from different angles, gathering information, and avoiding jumping to conclusions all aligns with the ''Discover'' phase of the ''Double Diamond''. --- Over the next week, Q reviews reports and talks to local experts. They find that: * The invasive crabs are burrowing into banks and damaging fishing gear. * They compete with native crabs and disturb the food web. * The spread seems faster in areas with heavy boat traffic. * Fishers worry about restrictions that could affect their income. ####How might Q define this problem to enable them to move forward? “How might we [[manage the spread of invasive crabs ->DsDf 1pt]] in a way that protects biodiversity while supporting local livelihoods?” "How might we [[stop this invasive species of crab ->DcPr]] from entering our local waterways?”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor says //“While acting quickly matters, we need to be careful not to jump straight to solutions before understanding the scale or cause of the problem. The ''Discover'' phase of the ''Double Diamond'' is all about exploring and learning first. Let’s step back and find out what’s really going on.”// --- Over the next week, Q reviews reports and talks to local experts. They find that: * The invasive crabs are burrowing into banks and damaging fishing gear. * They compete with native crabs and disturb the food web. * The spread seems faster in areas with heavy boat traffic. * Fishers worry about restrictions that could affect their income. ####How might Q define this problem to enable them to move forward? “How might we [[manage the spread of invasive crabs->AsDf 1pt]] in a way that protects biodiversity while supporting local livelihoods?” "How might we [[stop this invasive species of crab ->AsPr]] from entering our local waterways?”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorHappyYYY.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor agrees. //“That’s a good way to frame it. It’s clear enough to guide us, but still open to creativity. It aligns with the ''Define'' phase of the ''Double Diamond''” // --- Q and their supervisor meet to discuss how to address the problem. They review examples from other regions that have dealt with similar invasive crabs. Methods include: * Community-led trapping schemes seem to be the most common method and is proven to reduce numbers, but it requires ongoing effort. * Incentives for the fishing community to sell invasive crabs as seafood * Some coastal areas used citizen science apps to track sightings and focus control measures. ####What should Q suggest? Let’s pick a method that’s been tried and tested elsewhere. [[Trapping seems to be the most common solution,->AsDfPr]] so let’s start a trapping programme. Combine what we’ve learned from other regions with some '''//What If//''' questions. For example: //What if// we [[create incentives for the fishing community to catch the crabs? ->AsDfDv 1pt]] //What if// we use citizen science to monitor their spread? //What if// we test barriers or traps at key sites?

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor says, “Stopping these crabs completely might be the goal, but that doesn’t consider the wider picture. We need to define the challenge so we can balance ecological and community needs. Let’s go with: //How might we manage the spread of invasive crabs in a way that protects biodiversity while supporting local livelihoods?//" --- Q and their supervisor meet to discuss how to address the problem. They review examples from other regions that have dealt with similar invasive crabs. Methods include: * Community-led trapping schemes seem to be the most common method and is proven to reduce numbers, but it requires ongoing effort. * Incentives for the fishing community to sell invasive crabs as seafood * Some coastal areas used citizen science apps to track sightings and focus control measures. ####What should Q suggest? Let’s pick a method that’s been tried and tested elsewhere. [[Trapping seems to be the most common solution,->AsPrPr]] so let’s start a trapping programme. Combine what we’ve learned from other regions with some '''//What If//''' questions. For example: //What if// we [[create incentives for the fishing community to catch the crabs?->AsPrDv 1pt]] //What if// we use citizen science to monitor their spread? //What if// we test barriers or traps at key sites?

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor says, “Stopping these crabs completely might be the goal, but that doesn’t consider the wider picture. We need to define the challenge so we can balance ecological and community needs. Let’s go with: //How might we manage the spread of invasive crabs in a way that protects biodiversity while supporting local livelihoods?//" --- Q and their supervisor meet to discuss how to address the problem. They review examples from other regions that have dealt with similar invasive crabs. Methods include: * Community-led trapping schemes seem to be the most common method and is proven to reduce numbers, but it requires ongoing effort. * Incentives for the fishing community to sell invasive crabs as seafood * Some coastal areas used citizen science apps to track sightings and focus control measures. ####What should Q suggest? Let’s pick a method that’s been tried and tested elsewhere. [[Trapping seems to be the most common solution, ->DcPrPr]] so let’s start a trapping programme. Combine what we’ve learned from other regions with some '''//What If//''' questions. For example: //What if// we [[create incentives for the fishing community to catch the crabs?->DcPrDv 1pt]] //What if// we use citizen science to monitor their spread? //What if// we test barriers or traps at key sites?

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorHappyYYY.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor agrees. //“That’s a good way to frame it. It’s clear enough to guide us, but still open to creativity. It aligns with the ''Define'' phase of the ''Double Diamond''” // --- Q and their supervisor meet to discuss how to address the problem. They review examples from other regions that have dealt with similar invasive crabs. Methods include: * Community-led trapping schemes seem to be the most common method and is proven to reduce numbers, but it requires ongoing effort. * Incentives for the fishing community to sell invasive crabs as seafood * Some coastal areas used citizen science apps to track sightings and focus control measures. ####What should Q suggest? Let’s pick a method that’s been tried and tested elsewhere. [[Trapping seems to be the most common solution, ->DcDfPr]] so let’s start a trapping programme. Combine what we’ve learned from other regions with some '''//What If//''' questions. For example: //What if// we [[create incentives for the fishing community to catch the crabs? ->DsDfDv 1pt]] //What if// we use citizen science to monitor their spread? //What if// we test barriers or traps at key sites?

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor cautions. //“It’s tempting to believe that what has worked elsewhere is the best option, but the ''Develop'' phase of the ''Double Diamond'' is about exploring a range of ideas before narrowing down. Let’s keep our options open for a little longer.” // --- Through an ideation session with various team members, they discuss the tried and tested methods and then come up with some innovative ideas including: * eDNA surveillance to detect early spread from water samples * Drone and thermal mapping to locate burrow hotspots and prioritise action. * Low-cost biodegradable traps designed to reduce bycatch and maintenance * Partnering with local organisations to turn crab biomass into fertiliser or animal feed * Testing different baits to encourage removal from sensitive zones Q’s supervisor says: “We’ve got a wide mix of ideas here. What do you think we should we do next?” ####What should Q suggest? “While there are some innovative ideas, [[the only idea that we have solid evidence for is community trapping.->DcDfPrPr]] We should go with that. It’s cheap, it’s familiar, and we can roll it out quickly.” “We could [[work with the fishing community, conservation officers and local businesses ->DcDfPrDv 1pt]] to discuss these new ideas and see what they think would work best. We could use a cost vs impact matrix to compare ecological gain, social acceptability, feasibility, and scale-up potential.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorHappyYYY.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor agrees //“That’s a smart approach. The ''Develop'' phase of the ''Double Diamond'' is about exploring a range of ideas before narrowing down”// --- Through an ideation session with various team members, they discuss the tried and tested methods and then come up with some innovative ideas including: * eDNA surveillance to detect early spread from water samples * Drone and thermal mapping to locate burrow hotspots and prioritise action. * Low-cost biodegradable traps designed to reduce bycatch and maintenance * Partnering with local organisations to turn crab biomass into fertiliser or animal feed * Testing different baits to encourage removal from sensitive zones Q’s supervisor says: “We’ve got a wide mix of ideas here. What do you think we should we do next?” ####What should Q suggest? “While there are some innovative ideas, [[the only idea that we have solid evidence for is community trapping.->DsDfDvPr]] We should go with that. It’s cheap, it’s familiar, and we can roll it out quickly.” “We could [[work with the fishing community, conservation officers and local businesses ->DsDfDvDv 1pt]] to discuss these new ideas and see what they think would work best. We could use a cost vs impact matrix to compare ecological gain, social acceptability, feasibility, and scale-up potential.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor cautions. //“It’s tempting to believe that what has worked elsewhere is the best option, but the ''Develop'' phase of the ''Double Diamond'' is about exploring a range of ideas before narrowing down. Let’s keep our options open for a little longer.” // --- Through an ideation session with various team members, they discuss the tried and tested methods and then come up with some innovative ideas including: * eDNA surveillance to detect early spread from water samples * Drone and thermal mapping to locate burrow hotspots and prioritise action. * Low-cost biodegradable traps designed to reduce bycatch and maintenance * Partnering with local organisations to turn crab biomass into fertiliser or animal feed * Testing different baits to encourage removal from sensitive zones Q’s supervisor says: “We’ve got a wide mix of ideas here. What do you think we should we do next?” ####What should Q suggest? “While there are some innovative ideas, [[the only idea that we have solid evidence for is community trapping.->DcPrPrPr]] We should go with that. It’s cheap, it’s familiar, and we can roll it out quickly.” “We could [[work with the fishing community, conservation officers and local businesses ->DcPrPrDv 1pt]] to discuss these new ideas and see what they think would work best. We could use a cost vs impact matrix to compare ecological gain, social acceptability, feasibility, and scale-up potential.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorHappyYYY.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor agrees //“That’s a smart approach. The ''Develop'' phase of the ''Double Diamond'' is about exploring a range of ideas before narrowing down”// --- Through an ideation session with various team members, they discuss the tried and tested methods and then come up with some innovative ideas including: * eDNA surveillance to detect early spread from water samples * Drone and thermal mapping to locate burrow hotspots and prioritise action. * Low-cost biodegradable traps designed to reduce bycatch and maintenance * Partnering with local organisations to turn crab biomass into fertiliser or animal feed * Testing different baits to encourage removal from sensitive zones Q’s supervisor says: “We’ve got a wide mix of ideas here. What do you think we should we do next?” ####What should Q suggest? “While there are some innovative ideas, [[the only idea that we have solid evidence for is community trapping.->DcPrDvPr]] We should go with that. It’s cheap, it’s familiar, and we can roll it out quickly.” “We could [[work with the fishing community, conservation officers and local businesses ->DcPrDvDv 1pt]] to discuss these new ideas and see what they think would work best. We could use a cost vs impact matrix to compare ecological gain, social acceptability, feasibility, and scale-up potential.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor cautions. //“It’s tempting to believe that what has worked elsewhere is the best option, but the ''Develop'' phase of the ''Double Diamond'' is about exploring a range of ideas before narrowing down. Let’s keep our options open for a little longer.” // --- Through an ideation session with various team members, they discuss the tried and tested methods and then come up with some innovative ideas including: * eDNA surveillance to detect early spread from water samples * Drone and thermal mapping to locate burrow hotspots and prioritise action. * Low-cost biodegradable traps designed to reduce bycatch and maintenance * Partnering with local organisations to turn crab biomass into fertiliser or animal feed * Testing different baits to encourage removal from sensitive zones Q’s supervisor says: “We’ve got a wide mix of ideas here. What do you think we should we do next?” ####What should Q suggest? “While there are some innovative ideas, [[the only idea that we have solid evidence for is community trapping.->AsDfPrPr]] We should go with that. It’s cheap, it’s familiar, and we can roll it out quickly.” “We could [[work with the fishing community, conservation officers and local businesses ->AsDfPrDv 1pt]] to discuss these new ideas and see what they think would work best. We could use a cost vs impact matrix to compare ecological gain, social acceptability, feasibility, and scale-up potential.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorHappyYYY.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor agrees //“That’s a smart approach. The ''Develop'' phase of the ''Double Diamond'' is about exploring a range of ideas before narrowing down”// --- Through an ideation session with various team members, they discuss the tried and tested methods and then come up with some innovative ideas including: * eDNA surveillance to detect early spread from water samples * Drone and thermal mapping to locate burrow hotspots and prioritise action. * Low-cost biodegradable traps designed to reduce bycatch and maintenance * Partnering with local organisations to turn crab biomass into fertiliser or animal feed * Testing different baits to encourage removal from sensitive zones Q’s supervisor says: “We’ve got a wide mix of ideas here. What do you think we should we do next?” ####What should Q suggest? “While there are some innovative ideas, [[the only idea that we have solid evidence for is community trapping. ->AsDfDvPr]] We should go with that. It’s cheap, it’s familiar, and we can roll it out quickly.” “We could [[work with the fishing community, conservation officers and local businesses ->AsDfDvDv 1pt]] to discuss these new ideas and see what they think would work best. We could use a cost vs impact matrix to compare ecological gain, social acceptability, feasibility, and scale-up potential.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor cautions. //“It’s tempting to believe that what has worked elsewhere is the best option, but the ''Develop'' phase of the ''Double Diamond'' is about exploring a range of ideas before narrowing down. Let’s keep our options open for a little longer.” // --- Through an ideation session with various team members, they discuss the tried and tested methods and then come up with some innovative ideas including: * eDNA surveillance to detect early spread from water samples * Drone and thermal mapping to locate burrow hotspots and prioritise action. * Low-cost biodegradable traps designed to reduce bycatch and maintenance * Partnering with local organisations to turn crab biomass into fertiliser or animal feed * Testing different baits to encourage removal from sensitive zones Q’s supervisor says: “We’ve got a wide mix of ideas here. What do you think we should we do next?” ####What should Q suggest? “While there are some innovative ideas, [[the only idea that we have solid evidence for is community trapping.->AsPrPrPr]] We should go with that. It’s cheap, it’s familiar, and we can roll it out quickly.” “We could [[work with the fishing community, conservation officers and local businesses ->AsPrPrDv 1pt]] to discuss these new ideas and see what they think would work best. We could use a cost vs impact matrix to compare ecological gain, social acceptability, feasibility, and scale-up potential.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorHappyYYY.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor agrees //“That’s a smart approach. The ''Develop'' phase of the ''Double Diamond'' is about exploring a range of ideas before narrowing down”// --- Through an ideation session with various team members, they discuss the tried and tested methods and then come up with some innovative ideas including: * eDNA surveillance to detect early spread from water samples * Drone and thermal mapping to locate burrow hotspots and prioritise action. * Low-cost biodegradable traps designed to reduce bycatch and maintenance * Partnering with local organisations to turn crab biomass into fertiliser or animal feed * Testing different baits to encourage removal from sensitive zones Q’s supervisor says: “We’ve got a wide mix of ideas here. What do you think we should we do next?” ####What should Q suggest? “While there are some innovative ideas, [[the only idea that we have solid evidence for is community trapping.->AsPrDvPr]] We should go with that. It’s cheap, it’s familiar, and we can roll it out quickly.” “We could [[work with the fishing community, conservation officers and local businesses ->AsPrDvDv 1pt]] to discuss these new ideas and see what they think would work best. We could use a cost vs impact matrix to compare ecological gain, social acceptability, feasibility, and scale-up potential.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorHappyYYY.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor agrees. //“That’s a smart approach. Comparing our ideas with input from the fishing community and other partners gave us a balanced view as we work through the ''Develop'' phase of the ''Double Diamond''.”// --- Over the next week, Q supports their supervisor in discussing the ideas with their group of stakeholders and compile a cost vs impact matrix comparing each idea. The results reveal: * Community trapping: Moderate ecological gain, high feasibility, low cost. * Biodegradable traps: Moderate gain, high social acceptability, good long-term potential. * eDNA surveillance: High ecological value as early warning but requires lab access. * Drone mapping: High cost but useful for identifying key areas. * Turning crab biomass into fertiliser/animal feed: Promising long-term potential, but uncertain feasibility. Q’s supervisor says: “We need to present a report with proposals to management. What do you think we should put in the report?” ####What should Q suggest? Let’s present [[the option that scored highest overall (community trapping) including plans for implementation.->Pr Good]] Given the need to deal with this problem quickly, [[we should recommend the community trapping and include plans for implementation. However, we could also recommend running small pilot projects to test a few of the other ideas that scored highly. ->Perfect 1pt]]

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor cautions.// “Evidence-based solutions are important, but we won’t know if these other ideas are useful unless we investigate them further. Let’s go to our stakeholders and see what they think about them.” // --- Over the next week, Q supports their supervisor in discussing the ideas with their group of stakeholders and compile a cost vs impact matrix comparing each idea. The results reveal: * Community trapping: Moderate ecological gain, high feasibility, low cost. * Biodegradable traps: Moderate gain, high social acceptability, good long-term potential. * eDNA surveillance: High ecological value as early warning but requires lab access. * Drone mapping: High cost but useful for identifying key areas. * Turning crab biomass into fertiliser/animal feed: Promising long-term potential, but uncertain feasibility. Q’s supervisor says: “We need to present a report with proposals to management. What do you think we should put in the report?” ####What should Q suggest? Let’s present [[the option that scored highest overall (community trapping) including plans for implementation.->Pr Good]] Given the need to deal with this problem quickly, [[we should recommend the community trapping and include plans for implementation. However, we could also recommend running small pilot projects to test a few of the other ideas that scored highly.->Good 1pt]]

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor cautions.// “Evidence-based solutions are important, but we won’t know if these other ideas are useful unless we investigate them further. Let’s go to our stakeholders and see what they think about them.” // --- Over the next week, Q supports their supervisor in discussing the ideas with their group of stakeholders and compile a cost vs impact matrix comparing each idea. The results reveal: * Community trapping: Moderate ecological gain, high feasibility, low cost. * Biodegradable traps: Moderate gain, high social acceptability, good long-term potential. * eDNA surveillance: High ecological value as early warning but requires lab access. * Drone mapping: High cost but useful for identifying key areas. * Turning crab biomass into fertiliser/animal feed: Promising long-term potential, but uncertain feasibility. Q’s supervisor says: “We need to present a report with proposals to management. What do you think we should put in the report?” ####What should Q suggest? Let’s present [[the option that scored highest overall (community trapping) including plans for implementation.->Pr Ok]] Given the need to deal with this problem quickly, [[we should recommend the community trapping and include plans for implementation. However, we could also recommend running small pilot projects to test a few of the other ideas that scored highly.->Good 1pt]]

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorHappyYYY.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor agrees. //“That’s a smart approach. Comparing our ideas with input from the fishing community and other partners gave us a balanced view as we work through the ''Develop'' phase of the ''Double Diamond''.”// --- Over the next week, Q supports their supervisor in discussing the ideas with their group of stakeholders and compile a cost vs impact matrix comparing each idea. The results reveal: * Community trapping: Moderate ecological gain, high feasibility, low cost. * Biodegradable traps: Moderate gain, high social acceptability, good long-term potential. * eDNA surveillance: High ecological value as early warning but requires lab access. * Drone mapping: High cost but useful for identifying key areas. * Turning crab biomass into fertiliser/animal feed: Promising long-term potential, but uncertain feasibility. Q’s supervisor says: “We need to present a report with proposals to management. What do you think we should put in the report?” ####What should Q suggest? Let’s present [[the option that scored highest overall (community trapping) including plans for implementation.->Pr Good]] Given the need to deal with this problem quickly, [[we should recommend the community trapping and include plans for implementation. However, we could also recommend running small pilot projects to test a few of the other ideas that scored highly.->Good 1pt]]

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorHappyYYY.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor agrees. //“That’s a smart approach. Comparing our ideas with input from the fishing community and other partners gave us a balanced view as we work through the ''Develop'' phase of the ''Double Diamond''.”// --- Over the next week, Q supports their supervisor in discussing the ideas with their group of stakeholders and compile a cost vs impact matrix comparing each idea. The results reveal: * Community trapping: Moderate ecological gain, high feasibility, low cost. * Biodegradable traps: Moderate gain, high social acceptability, good long-term potential. * eDNA surveillance: High ecological value as early warning but requires lab access. * Drone mapping: High cost but useful for identifying key areas. * Turning crab biomass into fertiliser/animal feed: Promising long-term potential, but uncertain feasibility. Q’s supervisor says: “We need to present a report with proposals to management. What do you think we should put in the report?” ####What should Q suggest? Let’s present [[the option that scored highest overall (community trapping) including plans for implementation. ->Pr Good]] Given the need to deal with this problem quickly, [[we should recommend the community trapping and include plans for implementation. However, we could also recommend running small pilot projects to test a few of the other ideas that scored highly.->Good 1pt]]

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor cautions.// “Evidence-based solutions are important, but we won’t know if these other ideas are useful unless we investigate them further. Let’s go to our stakeholders and see what they think about them.” // --- Over the next week, Q supports their supervisor in discussing the ideas with their group of stakeholders and compile a cost vs impact matrix comparing each idea. The results reveal: * Community trapping: Moderate ecological gain, high feasibility, low cost. * Biodegradable traps: Moderate gain, high social acceptability, good long-term potential. * eDNA surveillance: High ecological value as early warning but requires lab access. * Drone mapping: High cost but useful for identifying key areas. * Turning crab biomass into fertiliser/animal feed: Promising long-term potential, but uncertain feasibility. Q’s supervisor says: “We need to present a report with proposals to management. What do you think we should put in the report?” ####What should Q suggest? Let’s present [[the option that scored highest overall (community trapping) including plans for implementation.->Pr Ok]] Given the need to deal with this problem quickly, [[we should recommend the community trapping and include plans for implementation. However, we could also recommend running small pilot projects to test a few of the other ideas that scored highly.->Good 1pt]]

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor cautions.// “Evidence-based solutions are important, but we won’t know if these other ideas are useful unless we investigate them further. Let’s go to our stakeholders and see what they think about them.” // --- Over the next week, Q supports their supervisor in discussing the ideas with their group of stakeholders and compile a cost vs impact matrix comparing each idea. The results reveal: * Community trapping: Moderate ecological gain, high feasibility, low cost. * Biodegradable traps: Moderate gain, high social acceptability, good long-term potential. * eDNA surveillance: High ecological value as early warning but requires lab access. * Drone mapping: High cost but useful for identifying key areas. * Turning crab biomass into fertiliser/animal feed: Promising long-term potential, but uncertain feasibility. Q’s supervisor says: “We need to present a report with proposals to management. What do you think we should put in the report?” ####What should Q suggest? (Let’s present [[the option that scored highest overall (community trapping) including plans for implementation.->Pr Ok]] Given the need to deal with this problem quickly, [[we should recommend the community trapping and include plans for implementation. However, we could also recommend running small pilot projects to test a few of the other ideas that scored highly. ->Ok 1pt]]

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorHappyYYY.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor agrees. //“That’s a smart approach. Comparing our ideas with input from the fishing community and other partners gave us a balanced view as we work through the ''Develop'' phase of the ''Double Diamond''.”// --- Over the next week, Q supports their supervisor in discussing the ideas with their group of stakeholders and compile a cost vs impact matrix comparing each idea. The results reveal: * Community trapping: Moderate ecological gain, high feasibility, low cost. * Biodegradable traps: Moderate gain, high social acceptability, good long-term potential. * eDNA surveillance: High ecological value as early warning but requires lab access. * Drone mapping: High cost but useful for identifying key areas. * Turning crab biomass into fertiliser/animal feed: Promising long-term potential, but uncertain feasibility. Q’s supervisor says: “We need to present a report with proposals to management. What do you think we should put in the report?” ####What should Q suggest? Let’s present [[the option that scored highest overall (community trapping) including plans for implementation. ->Pr Ok]] Given the need to deal with this problem quickly, [[we should recommend the community trapping and include plans for implementation. However, we could also recommend running small pilot projects to test a few of the other ideas that scored highly.->Good 1pt]] .

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor cautions.// “Evidence-based solutions are important, but we won’t know if these other ideas are useful unless we investigate them further. Let’s go to our stakeholders and see what they think about them.” // --- Over the next week, Q supports their supervisor in discussing the ideas with their group of stakeholders and compile a cost vs impact matrix comparing each idea. The results reveal: * Community trapping: Moderate ecological gain, high feasibility, low cost. * Biodegradable traps: Moderate gain, high social acceptability, good long-term potential. * eDNA surveillance: High ecological value as early warning but requires lab access. * Drone mapping: High cost but useful for identifying key areas. * Turning crab biomass into fertiliser/animal feed: Promising long-term potential, but uncertain feasibility. Q’s supervisor says: “We need to present a report with proposals to management. What do you think we should put in the report?” ####What should Q suggest? Let’s present [[the option that scored highest overall (community trapping) including plans for implementation.->Pr Ok]] Given the need to deal with this problem quickly, [[we should recommend the community trapping and include plans for implementation. However, we could also recommend running small pilot projects to test a few of the other ideas that scored highly.->Ok 1pt]]

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorHappyYYY.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor agrees. //“That’s a smart approach. Comparing our ideas with input from the fishing community and other partners gave us a balanced view as we work through the ''Develop'' phase of the ''Double Diamond''.”// --- Over the next week, Q supports their supervisor in discussing the ideas with their group of stakeholders and compile a cost vs impact matrix comparing each idea. The results reveal: * Community trapping: Moderate ecological gain, high feasibility, low cost. * Biodegradable traps: Moderate gain, high social acceptability, good long-term potential. * eDNA surveillance: High ecological value as early warning but requires lab access. * Drone mapping: High cost but useful for identifying key areas. * Turning crab biomass into fertiliser/animal feed: Promising long-term potential, but uncertain feasibility. Q’s supervisor says: “We need to present a report with proposals to management. What do you think we should put in the report?” ####What should Q suggest? Let’s present [[the option that scored highest overall (community trapping) including plans for implementation.->Pr Ok]] Given the need to deal with this problem quickly, [[we should recommend the community trapping and include plans for implementation. However, we could also recommend running small pilot projects to test a few of the other ideas that scored highly.->Good 1pt]] .

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor cautions.// “Evidence-based solutions are important, but we won’t know if these other ideas are useful unless we investigate them further. Let’s go to our stakeholders and see what they think about them.” // --- Over the next week, Q supports their supervisor in discussing the ideas with their group of stakeholders and compile a cost vs impact matrix comparing each idea. The results reveal: * Community trapping: Moderate ecological gain, high feasibility, low cost. * Biodegradable traps: Moderate gain, high social acceptability, good long-term potential. * eDNA surveillance: High ecological value as early warning but requires lab access. * Drone mapping: High cost but useful for identifying key areas. * Turning crab biomass into fertiliser/animal feed: Promising long-term potential, but uncertain feasibility. Q’s supervisor says: “We need to present a report with proposals to management. What do you think we should put in the report?” ####What should Q suggest? Let’s present [[the option that scored highest overall (community trapping) including plans for implementation. ->Poor]] Given the need to deal with this problem quickly, [[we should recommend the community trapping and include plans for implementation. However, we could also recommend running small pilot projects to test a few of the other ideas that scored highly.->Ok 1pt]]

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorHappyYYY.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor agrees. //“That’s a smart approach. Comparing our ideas with input from the fishing community and other partners gave us a balanced view as we work through the ''Develop'' phase of the ''Double Diamond''.”// --- Over the next week, Q supports their supervisor in discussing the ideas with their group of stakeholders and compile a cost vs impact matrix comparing each idea. The results reveal: * Community trapping: Moderate ecological gain, high feasibility, low cost. * Biodegradable traps: Moderate gain, high social acceptability, good long-term potential. * eDNA surveillance: High ecological value as early warning but requires lab access. * Drone mapping: High cost but useful for identifying key areas. * Turning crab biomass into fertiliser/animal feed: Promising long-term potential, but uncertain feasibility. Q’s supervisor says: “We need to present a report with proposals to management. What do you think we should put in the report?” ####What should Q suggest? Let’s present [[the option that scored highest overall (community trapping) including plans for implementation.->Pr Ok]] Given the need to deal with this problem quickly, [[we should recommend the community trapping and include plans for implementation. However, we could also recommend running small pilot projects to test a few of the other ideas that scored highly.->Ok 1pt]]

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor cautions.// “Evidence-based solutions are important, but we won’t know if these other ideas are useful unless we investigate them further. Let’s go to our stakeholders and see what they think about them.” // --- Over the next week, Q supports their supervisor in discussing the ideas with their group of stakeholders and compile a cost vs impact matrix comparing each idea. The results reveal: * Community trapping: Moderate ecological gain, high feasibility, low cost. * Biodegradable traps: Moderate gain, high social acceptability, good long-term potential. * eDNA surveillance: High ecological value as early warning but requires lab access. * Drone mapping: High cost but useful for identifying key areas. * Turning crab biomass into fertiliser/animal feed: Promising long-term potential, but uncertain feasibility. Q’s supervisor says: “We need to present a report with proposals to management. What do you think we should put in the report?” ####What should Q suggest? Let’s present [[the option that scored highest overall (community trapping) including plans for implementation.->Poor]] Given the need to deal with this problem quickly, [[we should recommend the community trapping and include plans for implementation. However, we could also recommend running small pilot projects to test a few of the other ideas that scored highly.->Ok 1pt]].

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor cautions.// “Evidence-based solutions are important, but we won’t know if these other ideas are useful unless we investigate them further. Let’s go to our stakeholders and see what they think about them.” // --- Over the next week, Q supports their supervisor in discussing the ideas with their group of stakeholders and compile a cost vs impact matrix comparing each idea. The results reveal: * Community trapping: Moderate ecological gain, high feasibility, low cost. * Biodegradable traps: Moderate gain, high social acceptability, good long-term potential. * eDNA surveillance: High ecological value as early warning but requires lab access. * Drone mapping: High cost but useful for identifying key areas. * Turning crab biomass into fertiliser/animal feed: Promising long-term potential, but uncertain feasibility. Q’s supervisor says: “We need to present a report with proposals to management. What do you think we should put in the report?” ####What should Q suggest? Let’s present [[the option that scored highest overall (community trapping) including plans for implementation.->Poor]] Given the need to deal with this problem quickly, [[we should recommend the community trapping and include plans for implementation. However, we could also recommend running small pilot projects to test a few of the other ideas that scored highly.->Poor]]

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorHappyYYY.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor agrees. //“That’s a smart approach. Comparing our ideas with input from the fishing community and other partners gave us a balanced view as we work through the ''Develop'' phase of the ''Double Diamond''.”// --- Over the next week, Q supports their supervisor in discussing the ideas with their group of stakeholders and compile a cost vs impact matrix comparing each idea. The results reveal: * Community trapping: Moderate ecological gain, high feasibility, low cost. * Biodegradable traps: Moderate gain, high social acceptability, good long-term potential. * eDNA surveillance: High ecological value as early warning but requires lab access. * Drone mapping: High cost but useful for identifying key areas. * Turning crab biomass into fertiliser/animal feed: Promising long-term potential, but uncertain feasibility. Q’s supervisor says: “We need to present a report with proposals to management. What do you think we should put in the report?” ####What should Q suggest? Let’s present [[the option that scored highest overall (community trapping) including plans for implementation.->Poor]] Given the need to deal with this problem quickly, [[we should recommend the community trapping and include plans for implementation. However, we could also recommend running small pilot projects to test a few of the other ideas that scored highly.->Ok 1pt]]

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QandSupHappyss.png" alt=""; width="65%"> Q’s supervisor agrees //“That’s a smart idea. It demonstrates that we’re being practical as well as thinking strategically about longer-term innovation.” // --- Q’s supervisor presents the report to management and key partners. The report highlights: A community trapping programme as a rapid, practical first step Small pilot projects to test eDNA monitoring, biodegradable traps, and use of crab biomass as potential long-term solutions. The team agrees that this combined approach balances urgency with innovation. The management team approves funding for the pilot studies, praising the clear, evidence-based reasoning and stakeholder collaboration. ####Congratulations on helping the team achieve this result. ''Here is your completion code: BIO-EM-DD''

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor cautions “It’s good to be decisive, but focusing on just one idea might overlook opportunities for longer-term innovation. The ''Deliver'' phase of the ''Double Diamond'' is about testing and refining before committing to a way forward.” --- Q’s supervisor presents the report to management and key partners. The report highlights: A community trapping programme as a rapid, practical first step Small pilot projects to test eDNA monitoring, biodegradable traps, and use of crab biomass as potential long-term solutions. The team agrees that this combined approach balances urgency with innovation. The management team approves funding for the pilot studies, praising the clear, evidence-based reasoning and stakeholder collaboration. ####Congratulations on helping the team achieve this result. ''Here is your completion code: BIO-EM-DD''

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor cautions “It’s good to be decisive, but focusing on just one idea might overlook opportunities for longer-term innovation. The ''Deliver'' phase of the ''Double Diamond'' is about testing and refining before committing to a way forward.” --- Q’s supervisor presents the report to management and key partners. The report highlights: A community trapping programme as a rapid, practical first step Small pilot projects to test eDNA monitoring, biodegradable traps, and use of crab biomass as potential long-term solutions. The team agrees that this combined approach balances urgency with innovation. The management team approves funding for the pilot studies, praising the clear, evidence-based reasoning and stakeholder collaboration. [[Please try again->Start]]

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QandSupHappyss.png" alt=""; width="60%"> Q’s supervisor agrees //“That’s a smart idea. It demonstrates that we’re being practical as well as thinking strategically about longer-term innovation.” // --- Q’s supervisor presents the report to management and key partners. The report highlights: A community trapping programme as a rapid, practical first step Small pilot projects to test eDNA monitoring, biodegradable traps, and use of crab biomass as potential long-term solutions. The team agrees that this combined approach balances urgency with innovation. The management team approves funding for the pilot studies, praising the clear, evidence-based reasoning and stakeholder collaboration. [[Please try again->Start]]

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/SupervisorNotHappy.png" alt=""; width="40%"> Q’s supervisor cautions “It’s good to be decisive, but focusing on just one idea might overlook opportunities for longer-term innovation. The ''Deliver'' phase of the ''Double Diamond'' is about testing and refining before committing to a way forward.” --- Q’s supervisor presents the report to management and key partners. The report highlights: A community trapping programme as a rapid, practical first step Small pilot projects to test eDNA monitoring, biodegradable traps, and use of crab biomass as potential long-term solutions. The team agrees that this combined approach balances urgency with innovation. The management team approves funding for the pilot studies, praising the clear, evidence-based reasoning and stakeholder collaboration. [[Please try again->Start]]